PCCM Hub
Back to Library
PleuralClassic Trial Must Read⚡ High-Yield Board Topic

Indwelling Pleural Catheters versus Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusion (TIME2)

Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC et al.·JAMA·2012· DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5480
Malignant Pleural EffusionMPEIndwelling Pleural CatheterIPCPleurodesisTIME2
AI

AI-Generated Summary

Educational summary — always verify with primary source
Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) causes significant dyspnea. Two main management options: talc pleurodesis (requires hospitalization) or indwelling pleural catheter (IPC, outpatient management). TIME2 was the first RCT comparing these strategies.

Study Design

Multicenter RCT (7 UK centers, n=106) comparing IPC vs. talc pleurodesis for symptomatic MPE.

Key Findings

IPC and talc pleurodesis provided equivalent dyspnea relief at 42 days (primary endpoint). IPC patients had shorter initial hospitalization (0 vs 4 days). IPC patients had more adverse events (cellulitis, pleural infections). 46% of IPC patients achieved spontaneous pleurodesis.

Clinical Bottom Line

IPC and talc pleurodesis are equivalent for symptom control in MPE. IPC is preferred for: outpatient management, trapped lung, poor performance status, or short life expectancy. Talc pleurodesis is preferred for: patients likely to achieve pleurodesis, longer life expectancy. 46% of IPC patients achieve auto-pleurodesis.

Limitations & Caveats

Small sample size. Short follow-up (42 days primary endpoint). Predominantly UK population.

Read Full Article

Access the complete publication on PubMed

Open PubMed

Send Feedback

Help us improve PCCM Hub

What kind of feedback do you have?