PCCM Hub
Back to Library
VascularClassic Trial Must Read⚡ High-Yield Board Topic

Fibrinolysis for Patients with Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism (PEITHO)

Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T et al.·New England Journal of Medicine·2014· DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302097
Pulmonary EmbolismPEThrombolysisFibrinolysisSubmassive PETenecteplase
AI

AI-Generated Summary

Educational summary — always verify with primary source
Background

Systemic thrombolysis is established for massive PE (hemodynamic instability). PEITHO tested whether thrombolysis benefits intermediate-risk (submassive) PE — RV dysfunction + troponin elevation but hemodynamically stable.

Study Design

Multicenter RCT (76 centers, 13 countries, n=1,006) comparing tenecteplase + heparin vs. placebo + heparin in intermediate-risk PE.

Key Findings

Tenecteplase reduced the composite of death or hemodynamic decompensation (2.6% vs 5.6%, p=0.02). However, major extracranial bleeding was significantly higher (6.3% vs 1.5%) and stroke (2.4% vs 0.2%, p=0.003).

Clinical Bottom Line

Systemic thrombolysis in submassive PE reduces hemodynamic decompensation but significantly increases major bleeding and stroke. Thrombolysis is NOT routinely recommended for submassive PE. Reserve for patients who deteriorate hemodynamically. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is an alternative with lower bleeding risk.

Limitations & Caveats

Composite endpoint driven by hemodynamic decompensation (not mortality). Tenecteplase dose not weight-adjusted in all patients.

Read Full Article

Access the complete publication on PubMed

Open PubMed

Send Feedback

Help us improve PCCM Hub

What kind of feedback do you have?