PCCM Hub
Back to Library
InfectionsRecent High-Impact Must Read⚡ High-Yield Board Topic

Meropenem versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections (MERINO)

Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC et al.·JAMA·2018· DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163
BacteremiaESBLMeropenemPiperacillin-TazobactamCarbapenemAntibiotic Stewardship
AI

AI-Generated Summary

Educational summary — always verify with primary source
Background

Piperacillin-tazobactam (pip-tazo) was widely used as a carbapenem-sparing alternative for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections. MERINO definitively tested this practice.

Study Design

Multicenter RCT (26 hospitals, 9 countries, n=391) comparing meropenem vs. piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of ESBL/AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections.

Key Findings

30-day mortality was significantly higher with pip-tazo (12.3% vs 3.7%, p=0.90 for non-inferiority — pip-tazo FAILED non-inferiority). Pip-tazo was inferior to meropenem.

Clinical Bottom Line

Piperacillin-tazobactam should NOT be used as definitive therapy for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections — use a carbapenem. This changed practice worldwide. Pip-tazo is acceptable for empiric therapy while awaiting sensitivities.

Limitations & Caveats

Excluded patients with urinary source (lower mortality). Used pip-tazo with extended infusion. Results may not apply to urinary tract infections.

Read Full Article

Access the complete publication on PubMed

Open PubMed

Send Feedback

Help us improve PCCM Hub

What kind of feedback do you have?