PCCM Hub
Back to Library
ObstructiveClassic Trial⚡ High-Yield Board Topic

START (2019)

New England Journal of Medicine·2019
LandmarkPractice-ChangingBoard-EssentialMust-KnowHigh-Yield
AI

AI-Generated Summary

Educational summary — always verify with primary source
Background

Guidelines recommend daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for mild asthma, but adherence is often poor. This study investigated if as-needed budesonide-formoterol could be a non-inferior alternative to maintenance ICS for preventing severe exacerbations in mild asthma.

Study Design

The START study was a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. It compared as-needed budesonide-formoterol with maintenance budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline, and with as-needed terbutaline alone, in adults and adolescents with mild asthma. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of severe asthma exacerbations.

Key Findings

As-needed budesonide-formoterol was non-inferior to maintenance budesonide for severe exacerbation rates (0.17 vs. 0.17 per patient-year). Both budesonide-formoterol as-needed and maintenance budesonide significantly reduced exacerbations compared to as-needed terbutaline (0.40 per patient-year). The total ICS dose was substantially lower in the as-needed budesonide-formoterol group.

Clinical Bottom Line

For patients with mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol is an effective and ICS-sparing alternative to daily maintenance ICS for preventing severe exacerbations.

Limitations & Caveats

The study population was predominantly white, and the generalizability to other populations may be limited. Adherence to daily ICS in the maintenance group might have been higher than in real-world settings due to trial participation.

Send Feedback

Help us improve PCCM Hub

What kind of feedback do you have?