PCCM Hub
Back to Library
PleuralRecent High-Impact Must Read⚡ High-Yield Board Topic

Talc Pleurodesis via Indwelling Pleural Catheter vs Standard Talc Pleurodesis for MPE (AMPLE)

Thomas R, Fysh ETH, Smith NA et al.·JAMA·2019· DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.11977
MPEMalignant Pleural EffusionIPCTalc PleurodesisAMPLE
AI

AI-Generated Summary

Educational summary — always verify with primary source
Background

AMPLE tested whether talc slurry instilled via IPC (outpatient) could achieve pleurodesis equivalent to standard talc pleurodesis via chest tube (inpatient).

Study Design

Multicenter RCT (8 Australian/UK centers, n=154) comparing talc via IPC vs. talc via chest tube for MPE.

Key Findings

Pleurodesis success at 35 days was equivalent (43% IPC-talc vs 51% chest tube-talc, p=0.31). IPC-talc patients had shorter initial hospitalization (0 vs 3.5 days). No difference in dyspnea, adverse events, or quality of life.

Clinical Bottom Line

Talc instilled via IPC achieves equivalent pleurodesis to standard chest tube talc pleurodesis, with the advantage of outpatient management. This supports IPC as the preferred first-line approach for MPE — pleurodesis can be attempted through the IPC without additional hospitalization.

Limitations & Caveats

Pleurodesis success rate was lower than expected in both arms. Short follow-up for a cancer population.

Read Full Article

Access the complete publication on PubMed

Open PubMed

Send Feedback

Help us improve PCCM Hub

What kind of feedback do you have?